Tag: Learning Materials & Tools

Clearing the Path for Assessment Innovation: The Role of Federal Policy

Realizing the full potential of student-centered learning requires transformation of traditional approaches to assessment and accountability.

It is time for policymakers to take a fresh look at these initiatives and take steps – both near- and longer-term – to better leverage federal support for states’ design and use of innovative, student-centered assessments.

To create more equitable assessment and accountability systems that empower and encourage the adoption of new teaching and learning models aligned to student-centered learning, we must shift course and provide a realistic pathway for state and local innovation. Without a clear pathway, educators and communities will lose faith in our systems and millions of federal dollars intended to support assessment innovation will not bear fruit. Now is the time to create the running room states and districts need to try new approaches and demonstrate impact.

In Clearing the Path for Assessment Innovation: The Role of Federal Policy, you will read about:

-Current federal assessment opportunities such as the Competitive Grants for State Assessments (CGSA) program, the Innovative Assessment Demonstration Authority (IADA) and flexibility within the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESSA)

-Innovation themes from states, including the critical importance of CGSA funding, efforts to leverage assessments to improve instruction and addressing assessment with related professional development

-Examples of assessment innovation from three states

-Recommendations for a path forward to build on the groundwork states are laying to foster innovation and opportunity in assessment across the nation

Read More »

Family Technology Access Survey

Hilltown Cooperative Charter Public School created a survey using Google Forms to learn more about how families were receiving information about the school’s events, announcements, and opportunities to be involved. The survey included demographic information so the staff could disaggregate the data and determine whether any trends were apparent within specific subgroups of their school community.

Read More »

Running an Effective Pilot Program

This document provides a step-by-step approach to designing and executing an edtech pilot program, reflecting on the data collected, and deciding whether to ditch, scale, or iterate on a tool. Users can utilize this note-taking resource to capture learnings, discussion questions, and observations throughout the pilot.

(This resource is part of the supplementary workbook found in theMA DESE EdTech Systems Guide.)

Read More »

Digital Tool Pilot Evaluation Rubric from Mendon-Upton Regional School District

The technology team at Mendon-Upton Regional School District (MURSD) designed this evaluation rubric to score edtech pilot proposals submitted by their teachers. Teachers can nominate specific edtech tools to pilot in their classroom that they believe would meet their students’ unique needs and have an impact on learning. Once teachers submit a proposal form, the MURSD technology team determines whether or not to approve the tool for a pilot program by reviewing district-identified non-negotiables (e.g., tool aligns to the district’s priorities, meets privacy requirements including FERPA and COPPA), teacher criteria (e.g., high perceived impact on learning, low perceived number of challenges, strong implementation plan), and technology criteria (e.g., interoperability, single sign-on, data visibility). After all factors are scored on a numerical scale, the technology team can approve or reject a proposed pilot.

Read More »

Digital Tool Pilot Proposal Form from Mendon-Upton Regional School District

Mendon-Upton Regional School District’s educators can propose a pilot of an edtech tool using a Google Form. The form collects technical information (e.g., integration with single sign-on), intended usage, features, challenges, and perceived impact on student learning. Educators can also identify other colleagues who plan to join the pilot, providing additional context to the district about planned usage.

Read More »

Edtech Focus Group Questions from KIPP MA

KIPP MA created a list of focus group questions for each audience they engaged with, including teachers, leaders, students, and families. The questions were grouped into six different themes, including student outcomes, student agency, digital literacy, support for all learners, conditions for success, and school-home connection.

Read More »

Edtech Grading Rubric

This grading rubric (modified from LearnPlatform’s EdTech Grading Rubric) helps collect feedback from educators around edtech tools, including background criteria such as duration and frequency of use, technical criteria such as ease of use and navigation, quality of features and content, and perceived impact on student learning and teaching effectiveness. The survey can be modified to fit different contexts, as well as collect feedback from stakeholders who are not direct educators (e.g., students, families).

Read More »
Scroll to Top