Guest blogger Tom Clark poses questions to researchers
Evaluation 2 min read

Here’s a blog post from guest blogger Tom Clark, PhD, TA Consulting:

The iNACOL Research Agenda Survey talked about what’s working, what the field is struggling with, and the gaps we see in knowledge in the field. I would argue that a focus on addressing the gaps in educational quality research is paramount.

Evidence-based quality standards for K-12 online and blended learning cannot be developed until such evidence is in place — as it is, at least in part — in higher education, where Quality Matters (quality matters.org) has created evidence-based standards grounded in “what works” in published educational research.

This grounding has facilitated development of what Quality Matters has characterized as a nationally recognized certification process that provides third party validation of the quality of courses and online components at over 700 participating colleges and universities.

Therefore, my questions are:

1) How can schools and programs in the field collaborate actively with educational researchers to help build the evidence base for what works in K-12 online and blended learning?
2) If sufficient evidence-based research is available, is it be feasible (and appropriate) to create a national quality process in K-12 online and blended learning similar to the postsecondary QM process?

If you have questions or comments for Tom, please list them below.

 

Related Posts

Teachers at the Forefront: What We’ve ...

Two Sides of the Same Coin: Using Techni...

Fourth and fifth grade students working on posters

Implementation Champions in Action: What...

A classroom scene showing students seated and attentively listening to David Delikat - a fourth year high school math teacher at ASU Prep. David served as an implementation champion (an educator who leads the way in adopting and supporting new practices) this year for ASU Prep’s ELI-supported initiative, “Archie."
Scroll to Top